Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Democratic Caucus Draft Letter to Bush

This is so important that I copied this from Raw Story:
The Honorable George W. Bush
President
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500


Dear Mr. President:

We are writing to express our concerns about your recent suggestion that the U.S. would potentially launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack against Iran. As you will recall, on April 18, 2006, you were asked "Sir, when you talk about Iran and you talk about how you have diplomatic efforts, you also say all options are on the table. Does that include the possibility of a nuclear strike?" Your response to this question was "All options are on the table."

While we share your concern about Iran's irresponsible violations of its commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and safeguards agreement which Iran signed with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), we do not believe that the U.S. should threaten to use nuclear weapons to resolve this crisis. We would also note that as the U.S. seeks to ensure strict Iranian compliance with its obligations under the NPT, we should keep in mind the fact that in connection with the 1995 NPT review conference, the United States issued a statement reaffirming earlier U.N. Security Council pledges that the U.S. "will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons except in the case of an invasion or any other attack on the United States, its territories, its armed forces or other troops, its allies, or on a State towards which it has a security commitment, carried out or sustained by such a non-nuclear-weapon State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State." We are not aware of any subsequent statements changing this position.

Global security will be greatly threatened if Iran develops nuclear weapons. However, a U.S. pre-emptive nuclear strike on Iran would likely have catastrophic consequences that counter U.S. security objectives - both in the Middle East and around the world. We therefore urge you to make it clear that the U.S. is not actively considering first use of nuclear weapons against Iran in response to its efforts to obtain uranium enrichment capabilities. We understand that in a crisis, many options - including military options -- must be carefully considered. But we believe there is still time for diplomacy and targeted sanctions to work and we urge you to focus your Administration's efforts on seeking a peaceful resolution of this crisis.

4 comments:

DC Peaches said...

Hi, my name is DC Peaches, or at least that's the name I go by on the internet, and I'm trying to make a blog of mine into a community for like-minded bloggers from Maryland. It's called The People's Republic of Maryland. The name is a response to an offhand comment by a conservative blogger. I've actually been doing some lobbying on the issue mentioned in this post, because I live right outside of Washington DC.
Anyway, if anyone that visits your blog or you are interested in joining my blog, please let me know.
I want it to develop into something like Blue Jersey(bluejersey.net), so you can look at their site as a reference. I originally planned to call the site Blue M'Land, but thought the new name was better.

Hope to hear from you and your fans,

-Peaches
peoplesrepublicofmd@gmail.com

markfromireland said...

"While we share your concern about Iran's irresponsible violations of its commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and safeguards agreement which Iran signed with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)"

Actually the IAEA have repeatedly stated that they have found no evidence of such violations.

And Good luck to dc peaches

markfromireland said...

PS: You'll note that I refrained from commenting on the all too typical arrogance of the Democratic Caucus presuming to dictate to another country (which is not in breach) that's because I'm in a foul temper tonight and would need to resort to language that would get me permanently banned to express myself. Master nation ... master race ... spot the difference.

Dr. C said...

Always appreciate your comments, MFI. Sadly, it makes no difference to Boy King if the Iranians followed agreements or not. It doesn't enter into his childish mind. No one here seems to know what's going to happen now that everyone recognizes that we have an idiot for president. An idiot. God help us.