tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9297799.post2861701863234811366..comments2023-10-26T10:02:51.761-04:00Comments on Dr. C.: A question of legitimacy - IIUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9297799.post-18517864699707199622009-03-03T08:38:00.000-05:002009-03-03T08:38:00.000-05:00my double chins are aquiver::))))))))))))))))my double chins are aquiver:<BR/>:))))))))))))))))Dr. Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06255898610620668624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9297799.post-89280903732809337662009-03-03T06:49:00.000-05:002009-03-03T06:49:00.000-05:00Outside of the "game," is of no concern; but withi...Outside of the "game," is of no concern; but <EM>within</EM> the boundaries of the analogous game, that is, the maker's (which maker(s) can make any boundaries (meaning what is explicitly given in the work (I know that you know that I know that you know* (the unreal becomes (for the duration (determined (with a razor sharp rapier, not a sledge) by the maker) of the game) the real) what I mean by that); what is not explicitly delineated is assumed to be allowed) or "givens" of their choosing) story, the painting, or whatever kind or coherent recording that one is perceiving.<BR/><BR/>The fact that Nu, Epsilon, Omega, Lambda, Q, and Delta must be what they must be doesn't mean you can't have pancakes for breakfast.<BR/><BR/>*Except for Felix, who, of course, (I know that he knows that I know) doesn't know (though, it is true that I don't know what it is that he doesn't know that I don't know).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com